Keynes
divided his book The General Theory of Employment, Interest and
Money into six different books,
each book containing multiple chapters. For now, I am going to follow
the same pattern in my review of his book. If any of the chapters
have too much information or require a more detailed explanation, I
might have to break them into smaller pieces.
Keynes states in the
preface of The General Theory
that he was addressing the book chiefly at his fellow economists, but
he hoped that it would be understandable by a more general, wider
audience.
Prior to Keynes
writing, and including some earlier writing by Keynes, the focus had
been on an instantaneous picture of the economy. The idea was that,
given a steady output, supply and demand forces would arise that
would cause the need to change the output. The problem was that they
dynamics of the change were left largely in the dark. In other words,
it seemed like they could get a picture of what would change that
very second, but not where the economy was going in general.
Keynes tries to correct
those problems with this book, stating:
This book, on the other hand, has evolved into what is primarily a study of the forces which determine changes in the scale of output and employment as a whole; and, whilst it is found that money enters into the economic scheme in an essential and peculiar manner, technical monetary detail falls into the background. A monetary economy, we shall find, is essentially one in which changing views about the future are capable of influencing the quantity of employment and not merely its direction.
So technical monetary
detail falls to the background? How can that be? Money seems to be
the thing that makes the world go around. It doesn't matter whether
it is concerning taxes, paychecks, retirement plans, or the latest
gadget advertised on television; money seems to be the primary focus
of all things political and economic. And that seems to be as true
today as it was in Keynes time. But Keynes warned that the difficulty
wasn't in the theories in the book, the problem was in the challenge
to see things differently than we have seen all our lives.
... a struggle of escape from habitual modes of thought and expression. The ideas which are here expressed so laboriously are extremely simple and should be obvious. The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones, which ramify, for those brought up as most of us have been, into every corner of our minds.
No comments:
Post a Comment